Diversity: is it a challenge to citizenship, an enrichment of citizenship, or both?

Diversity has become a core area of discussion when it comes to culture, society and immigration. Our world is increasingly becoming a place where many people live in cultures other than their own. At present, it is rare to find a country with a homogenous society. People from different cultures, ethnicities, backgrounds and religions are living side by side in unprecedented ways.

            The introduction of the internet and mass media has made people aware of differences in nations. Some countries such as Canada have opened up their borders to attract immigrants that the country needs to thrive. Political, economical, social and religiously driven unrest have forced many people to flee their home countries. Additionally, the advancements in transport have made global mobility a reality instead of a farfetched dream.

            We are in a time where there is rife debate on the idea of diversity and Multiculturalism. Many European leaders have recently declared that multiculturalism has failed. Some, such as British Prime Minister David Cameron have gone as far as partially blamed multiculturalism for fostering Islamist extremism[1]. Diversity could threaten the national culture and values, they seem to argue. On the other hand, many others believe diversity has enriched the fabric of their society. Diversity helps broaden the perspective and tolerance of a people. It also helps them learn to deal better with different cultures and broaden view of the world.

            In my assessment, diversity can be both a challenge and an enrichment to citizenship. I believe that diversity is a positive factor in encouraging citizens to thrive in terms of tolerance, creativity and to stop the society from being a homogenous one with dogmatic views. On the other hand, I do believe that there needs to be base agreements on core values and societal norms that connect all these diverse citizens together.

            A society where everyone only follows their own cultural background is a society where the citizens are not united in any way. A society with non-unified people will not advance. People need to take pride in their country, believe in it and aim to advance it. Citizens of a country should respect diversity and welcome new immigrants while holding onto what is the fundamental meaning of being a citizen of that nation. For example, a commitment to respecting religious beliefs, adhering to human rights, fighting against discrimination and believing in democracy are example of things that could be basic national values. These values could be seen as the core foundations of citizens in a specific country for example. Another such factor would be language. People should have a good command and be able to communicate in the language of the country they live in. This is not to say that if the language from their cultural backgrounds is different they should abandon it. On the contrary, as citizens of a diverse nation, they should relish and be fluent in both.

            A further look into the words of European leaders could help us understand the issue more. President Sarkozy made his views clear recently on a television interview. "Of course we must all respect differences, but we do not want... a society where communities coexist side by side. If you come to France, you accept to melt into a single community, which is the national community, and if you do not want to accept that, you cannot be welcome in France," he is quoted as saying by an Agence France-Presse article[2]. "The French national community cannot accept a change in its lifestyle, equality between men and women... freedom for little girls to go to school...we have been too concerned about the identity of the person who was arriving and not enough about the identity of the country that was receiving him.”

            Sarkozy here is both making a good point, yet also taking it a little too far. His belief that immigrants should “melt into the national community” seems to be somewhat extreme. It seems to imply that people have to fit in and be homogenous instead of following the core French values while being distinctive. However, he is right in that immigrants should not go to France and try to enforce forms of cultural beliefs or values that clash with the national French identity. He makes a good point when he talks about the fact that there was not enough concern about the identity of France. There must be a social glue that binds together French citizens. There should be an attempt to define what it means to be a citizen of France. That definition should make a commitment to also respect the diversity of the French population. This is what I mean by the idea that there should be core societal values that are supplemented by diversity.

            Comments by British Prime Minister David Cameron also echo the sentiment that multiculturalism fails if there is no national identity. “Under the doctrine of state multiculturalism, we have encouraged different cultures to live separate lives, apart from each other and the mainstream,” he is quoted as saying in an MSNBC article [3]. “We have failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong,” he is quoted as saying.  Stressing on my earlier point, a society where people do not feel like they belong could foster a feeling of apathy and separation between citizens. One of the keys to good citizenship is being active in society and caring about your country. I agree with the view that a sense of national pride should be encouraged in new immigrants. The challenge here is to stop making them feel like outsiders and to truly embrace them in a way that will instill in them the motivation to adopt the basic core national values while living with their cultural identity.

            Irene Bloemraad an associate professor at the University of California at Berkeley, scholar and author, argues that in a country like Canada multiculturalism and diversity work. In a Globe and Mail article she states that her research shows that multiculturalism is a key factor in the successful citizenship integration. “It legitimates diversity, provides a sense of inclusion and, through the multitude of (oft-maligned) government grants given to community-based organizations – not only for multiculturalism but also for a host of integration programs – it provides the support structures to help newcomers join the country as full citizens,” she states[4]. It is key to note here that she mentions a sense of inclusion. This supports my point that when included in society, immigrants or culturally diverse citizens feel like they belong to the culture and thus will add to it. 

            “Like health care and hockey, multiculturalism has become a symbol of what defines Canada. In poll after poll, Canadians say multiculturalism is one of the top three defining features of the country. What’s more, they are proud of it,” Bloemraad states. “They should be. Over four decades, incredibly rapid demographic change has transformed Canada, especially its largest cities. In Europe, similar change has resulted in riots and cultural tensions that have tarnished the concept of multiculturalism there. But, in Canada, these changes, despite many challenges, happened peacefully, productively and positively. Multiculturalism was part of the solution, not the problem.” Her views show that the value of multiculturalism has become a part of what it means to be Canadian. This seems to be one of the basic values that defines a Canadian citizen. The fact that individuals with diverse backgrounds are welcomed and made to feel an integral part of the society could encourage them to participate in it more. This is how Europe, in my opinion, has failed. Canada’s multicultural policy has ensured from the start that immigrants and diverse individuals are not treated as second-class citizens but as part of the Canadian society.

            There is no doubt that diversity with all its benefits can be challenging to the idea of citizenship. Recent problems in Europe have highlighted this. The words by European leaders show that there is a crisis with dealing with diversity, creating national pride and including immigrants and citizens with diverse cultural, ethnic and religious backgrounds. The only way forward is to focus on the idea of citizenship that makes citizens appreciate for and look to diversity while maintaining pride in their nationality. This can be done by fostering a sense of commitment to core values that bring the citizens together. Without this citizen-cohesion, diversity will never be able to flourish in a way that benefits society and the individual citizen.

Sources:

[1] (2011, February 06). British PM: Multiculturalism has failed. MSNBC.com.
     Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41444364/ 
[2]  (2011, February 10). Multiculturalism has failed, says French president. Agence France-Presse
     Retrieved from http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jR1m5BpdMrDES3u4Cso1v3FwQRUg?docId=CNG.6b096ac0cdcfce7a0f599fbbb1c85c27.911
[3] (2011, February 06). British PM: Multiculturalism has failed. MSNBC.com.
     Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41444364/
[4] (2011, February 10). Multiculturalism has been Canada’s solution, not its problem. The Globe and Mail.
     Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/multiculturalism-has-been-canadas-solution-not-its-problem/article1775471/

To risk or not: Women Journalists, Sexual Assault & Foreign Correspondence

This year’s uprisings and revolutions in the Middle East have put many journalists in dangerous situations. Perhaps one of the most pressing issues that have come to the forefront is that of sexual assault on journalists- by far the majority of whom are women. The horrific sexual and physical assault on CBS reporter Lara Logan in Egypt in February and her subsequent sharing of the terrible details of the ordeal was one of the first instances where a female reporter has brought the issue to the spotlight.

A debate regarding the safety of women journalists, the kinds of assignments they should go on and the role of the news organization to ensure their safety started to take place in the media sphere. Logan’s coming forward inspired other female journalists to do the same and explain what they went through and why the vast majority of them never reported it.

Press freedom groups such as the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) started incorporating elements discussing this issue in their security guidebook- surprisingly they had not done so before. Certain recommendations and shortcomings have been brought to the light.

However, almost nine months after the Logan incident, two more female journalists were sexually assaulted in Egypt. These two incidents stirred the debate even more: Was it safe for female journalists to report from Egypt?

This paper will look at the three instances of sexual assaults on female journalists in Egypt and examine some of the new information regarding sexual assault of journalists. It will also bring forward the arguments of female foreign correspondents who are angered by the concept of being barred from their assignments. Finally it will examine some of the new developments regarding this issue and set forth some recommendations.

Three sexual assaults, one revolution:

February 11, 2011 was a historic day for Egypt. Hosni Mubarak had stepped down as president after 30 years of an iron fist rule and 18 days of mass street protests. It was a reporters dream to cover such a monumental event in the strategic country.

However, the same day will also be remembered as the day a horrific event took place that would start a major discussion in the journalism field.  Lara Logan was reporting from Tahrir Square, the center of protests in Cairo, when she was separated from her crew by a frenzied mob of about 200-300 men. In a 60 Minutes interview about the attack, Logan discussed the events and said that it all started out of nowhere[1]. “And it's like suddenly, before I even know what's happening, I feel hands grabbing my breasts, grabbing my crotch, grabbing me from behind. I mean - and it's not one person and then it stops - it's like one person and another person and another person,[2]” she said.

The sexual assault was so horrific, that she didn’t realize she was also being beaten with flagpoles and sticks, she said. “...The sexual assault, was all I could feel, was their hands raping me over and over and over again,[3]” she said.

After around 25 minutes of sustained sexual violence and being pulled and pushed in different directions by the mob, Logan stumbled and fell into the arms of an Egyptian woman who was camping in the square. The woman covered Logan’s naked body and a group of citizens formed a barrier around her.  After being persuaded by her crew, some soldiers were finally able to beat their way through the mob and return Logan to safety.

Following the attack on Logan and her choice to go public, other journalists who experienced sexual assault were more willing to discuss what they went through. In June, the CPJ–where Logan is a board member- published a special report entitled The Silencing Crime: Sexual violence and journalists[4]CPJ interviewed over four dozen journalists who experienced varying degrees of sexual assault. They included 27 local journalists- five of whom described being “brutally raped” and 25 international journalists- two of whom reported being raped and five who described “serious sexual violation.[5]

The report contended that sexual aggression on the job took many forms and that the vast majority of it was on females. The report found that many of the assaults fall into three general types: “targeted sexual violation of specific journalists, often in reprisal for their work; mob-related sexual violence against journalists covering public events; and sexual abuse of journalists in detention or captivity.”    

On November 23, Egyptian-American journalist Mona Eltahawy was covering the protests that were decrying military rule. Eltahawy was tweeting her observations, when suddenly she wrote “beaten arrested in interior ministry.[6]”  The next day, Eltahawy tweeted that she was released after 12 hours in detention and she revealed more about her ordeal. One of her tweets revealed that she was sexually assaulted. “5 or 6 surrounded me, groped and prodded my breasts, grabbed my genital area and I lost count how many hands tried to get into my trousers.[7]

In an interview with NPR she said that the security forces “…beat me viciously with their sticks, which is how my left arm and my right hand were broken, and then they sexually assaulted me, which I just had hands all over my body; on my breasts, in between my legs. I lost count of the number of hands that tried to get into my trousers. And all of this while they were beating me and cursing me, pulling my hair and dragging me towards the interior ministry.[8]

The same day of Eltahawy’s release, a French journalist working for France 3 was beaten and sexually assaulted while covering the protests. She told the AFP that she and her camera-man were mobbed by young people around 14 or 15 years of age [9]. They were dragged closer to the square and then she became separated from her cameraman. "We were then assaulted by a crowd of men. I was beaten by a group of youngsters and adults who tore my clothes" and then molested her in a way that "would be considered rape,” Sinz said.

"Some people tried to help me but failed. I was lynched. It lasted three quarters of an hour before I was taken out. I thought I was going to die.”

Is it too much of a risk for women journalists?

Merely hours after confirmed reports of Logan’s attack, several network executives held a meeting to discuss whether female journalists belong in the Middle East, according to columnist Rob Shuter[10]. He writes that he talked to three different senior management sources that told him several networks were debating removing female journalists from Egypt until safety can be guaranteed. He quotes an unidentified “top CBS source[11]” as telling him that there is no doubt that women have proved they are as good as male reporters, if not better. “However, the simple fact exists that in certain environments, being a woman is more dangerous, and one such place is the Middle East,[12]" the source said.

After the attack on Eltahaway and Sinz last month, Reporters Sans Frontiers took the step to suggest that media refrain from sending female journalists to report on the events in Egypt.  In the original statement they said:

 

This is at least the third time a woman reporter has been sexually assaulted since the start of the Egyptian revolution. Media should take this into account and for the time being stop sending female journalists to cover the situation in Egypt. It is unfortunate that we have come to this but, given the violence of these assaults, there is no other solution[13].

However, the Guardian reported that “the advice triggered a wave of objections from journalists[14]”, and that the RSF amended their statement within hours.

The modified statement urged editors to prioritize the safety of their staff and said:

It is more dangerous for a woman than a man to cover the demonstrations in Tahrir Square. That is the reality and the media must face it. It is the first time that there have been repeated sexual assaults against women reporters in the same place. The media must keep this in mind when sending staff there and must take special safety measures.

We are not saying the international media should pull out and stop covering events in Egypt. But they need to adapt to the threats that currently exist. And women journalists going to Tahrir Square should be aware of this situation.[15]

Many female journalists, and especially female foreign correspondents, were insulted and wrote about their frustration with the statement. In an entry for the Guardian[16], British journalist Jenny Kleeman called it discrimination and said instead of making such statements, the RSF should campaign for editors to spend more money on the teams that are dispatched abroad. She writes:

Their position is clear, and still discriminatory: editors shouldn't be sending female staff to cover the protests, and the women who do go there to work as reporters have been warned. Does that mean that now if another female journalist is attacked in Tahrir Square, it will be her fault?

If RSF really wanted to protect women working for the media in Tahrir Square, it could campaign for editors to spend more money on the teams they send there…Instead, RSF is saying the only way to protect women reporters is to impose wholesale discrimination against them.

It's profoundly disappointing, and, for once, I hope that no editor is listening to them. [17]

Kleeman stipulates that the threat on women is real and should not be underestimated however she asserts that the threat to men is the same and she points to the fact that the majority of journalists killed on the job this year are male. She also states that women have fought hard to be able to convince their editors they should be treated equally and this should not be taken lightly.

Being a female journalist could actually help get stories that would be difficult for male journalist to have access to. In an article[18] published after Logan’s attack, journalist Kim Barker points to stories such as child marriage in India and rape in Congo and Haiti. “[Women journalists] do a pretty good job of covering what it’s like to live in a war, not just die in one. Without female correspondents in war zones, the experiences of women there may be only a rumor,” she writes. “Female journalists often tell those stories in the most compelling ways, because abused women are sometimes more comfortable talking to them. And those stories are at least as important as accounts of battles.[19]

Al Jazeera foreign correspondent Dorothy Paravaz who was detained for 19 days between Syria and Iran earlier this year said she was frustrated by the debate. "For decades, our male counterparts have been arrested, beaten up, tortured, even killed and it's inconceivable that any editor would say to stop sending reporters,[20]” she said. "The reality is that, in the Middle East in particular, some of the best correspondents in the field are women."

Channel 4’s News international editor Lindsey Hilsum conveyed similar sentiment. She writes that the debate has shifted into old territory and that “those who hate to see women reporting the big stories disguise their glee as concern, but their message is the same - you shouldn't be out there.[21]” She argues that she doesn’t believe that there is something “especially dangerous” about being a female journalist reporting on the frontline. In over 25 of experience reporting on wars, coups, uprisings and such she was never sexually assaulted, Hislum writes. However, she did have to endure beatings, escape bombs, duck gunfire- just like her male colleagues did. She further adds that she does not believe that female correspondents are at a higher risk of sexual assault than women in any walk of life.

Furthermore, she reiterates the argument that her gender was an advantage at many times during her career. This was especially true in the Middle East where she had access to more traditional women.  Concurrently she never had trouble meeting with political leaders or generals. In a snarky section she writes:

Since female journalists are able to report all aspects of the story, not just what the men say or do, it is clearly an advantage to be a woman. Nonetheless, I believe men should still be allowed to report the Middle East. I understand their limitations, but I think they have a contribution to make and it would be wrong to discriminate against them. [22]

Journalist Ann Friedman also writes that this old worn-out argument has been an excuse for men and that the only way forward is to keep women included.

Concerns for women’s safety (some valid, some overblown) have long been used as an excuse to exclude us from all sorts of jobs and opportunities. It’s why we’re technically banned from military combat positions. It’s why we still aren’t allowed to ski-jump in the Olympics. It’s one reason why there are so few women reporting from war zones and areas where there is political unrest. This creates a hard rhetorical line to walk: Some jobs are indeed more dangerous for women than for men. But women still have every right to hold those jobs, too. In fact, when it comes to many dangerous professions, it’s only by women’s inclusion that conditions can begin to change. [23]

Ensuring journalists’ safety:

Judith Matloff, who teaches a course on conflict reporting at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism, believes the solution is to prepare women journalists to “deal with the unmentionable[24]” rather than remove them off assignment. Matloff was one of the first journalists to bring the issue of sexual assault light in her 2007 piece entitled Unspoken[25].

Prior to that, in 2005, Matloff had stated that female war correspondents face problems in two main categories: biology and society[26]. In terms of biology she mentions the risk and fear of rape. Although she said she had never been raped she knows three colleagues who have been- one by a translator/fixer recommended by three male coworkers who never had problems with them. The other issues she brought up under biology were flak jackets (which are designed to fit men), menstruation (some female journalists take hormonal pills to avoid getting their period on assignment to avoid embarrassment) and miscarriages.

In terms of societal problems, she argues that women journalists feel like they need to take “ridiculous risks” to prove they are “tougher than the guys.”[27]  This pressure continues because many men in the field don’t treat them as equals, she said. “A lot of women are doing really dumb, stupid things because they don’t want to appear to be scared.”

The other main problem is sexual harassment by coworkers which is very frequent and happens in huge amounts, she argues. This is especially true in foreign correspondence because of the frequent need to share where they sleep. Male co-workers should be held accountable for these actions, states Matloff:

Ideas get into peoples heads and I think there has to be a newsroom culture where it is completely verboten. Men should be told — it’s in my contract at Columbia, don’t harass your students; well maybe it should be in your contract when you join the BBC — don’t harass your equals. And it’s not part of the corporate culture I think in most news organisations. [28]

Ever since the Lara Logan attack, newsrooms, press freedom organization and media analysts have become more aware about the issue of sexual violence. Alongside with the special report the CPJ published after the attack, it also published an addendum focusing on sexual assault to its security guide. The addendum pulled on advice from checklists published by Judith Matloff for the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) and the International News Safety Institute (INSI) and suggestions from journalists and security experts. 

“Being aware of one's environment and understanding how one may be perceived in that setting are important in deterring many forms of sexual aggression [29],” the section states. It highlights some of the ways to try and deter unwanted advances, react to danger and stay away from risk. These range from tips about appearance- such as wearing a wedding band and clothing that is hard to remove- to what to do if faced with the prospect of sexual assault, such as changing the dynamic by yelling something unexpected or urinating or soiling oneself.

The CPJ further recommends that news organizations include guidelines on the risk of sexual assault in their security manuals in order to increase attention and encourage discussion. They also urge managers and editors to react sensitively to the assaulted journalists wishes in terms of confidentiality and be mindful of the emotional impact of such an event.

Organizations can set clear policies on how to respond to sexual assaults that address the journalist's needs for medical, legal, and psychological support. Such reports should be treated as a medical urgency and as an overall security threat that affects other journalists…Some journalists told CPJ they were reluctant to report sexual abuse because they did not want to be perceived as being vulnerable while on dangerous assignments. Editorial managers should create a climate in which journalists can report assaults without fear of losing future assignments and with confidence they will receive support and assistance. [30]

News organizations also seem to be showing a commitment to further their staff’s safety when it comes to sexual violence. Various news organizations have incorporated the threat of sexual assault into their security training, according to the CPJ[31].  For example, Thomson Reuters is adjusting their training to include “more training in culture skills to help journalists navigate chaotic crowds[32]”. Security professionals who train journalists are also adjusting their curriculum to reflect changes. Previously, former military personal were behind much of the security training for journalists. But as the risk of harm from civilians increases, more civilian experts are taking prominent role in preparing journalists for what they might face in the field. [33]

Conclusion:

Women still face disadvantages in the world of journalism even though they have made steady progress throughout the years. In a 2001 study, Karen Ross summarizes the difficulties some women face on the job[34]. These include difficulties trying to manage work/home balance and rampant sexual harassment. In another study, Gertrude J. Robinson[35], discusses how there is a disparity between salaries for both genders, hardship integrating into male newsroom culture and sexism in the way women are dealt with and assigned stories.

It is clear that women still face more obstacles in the field of journalism even though they have proven themselves to be just as competent. Now that it is not unusual to see a women reporting from conflict zones, it seems the issue of sexual aggression has brought the debate of whether they belong there into the spotlight.

However, like female foreign correspondents argue, women journalists have fought hard and proved that they report just as well as men and in some instances get to the stories men cannot get. Women are more vulnerable and are target for sexual assault more than men- that is a fact. However the concept of risk and danger is not exclusive to women. Male journalists have been hurt, sexually assaulted, attacked, detained and killed as well.

Barring women journalists from foreign assignments is discrimination. It was exactly this threat that was one of the main reasons for women journalists who were sexually assaulted to not come forward with their stories.  Instead of taking this approach, news organizations and the journalism community should be open to discussion, and provide support, advice and training.

Most importantly decisions should not be made for women as if they have no say. NBC’s vice president for newsgathering, David Verdi, approaches it correctly:

Is a woman more vulnerable because rape is a weapon of war? It always comes down to the same answer: It’s a voluntary assignment and we’re going to openly discuss all of the risks. We’re about mitigating risks, and we’re about complete and total transparency. In the end, we let our employees make the final decision about putting themselves into harm’s way. [36]

It seems that news organizations and press freedom organizations are moving in the right direction and trying to incorporate more awareness and mechanisms to deal with the risk of sexual assault. All journalists should be educated about how to protect themselves and where to find support when they need it.

More awareness about locale is also a necessity. For example, Logan has said that she was not aware of the levels of harassment and abuse that women in Egypt experienced[37]. A 2008 poll of 2,020 Egyptians and 109 non-Egyptian women showed that 83% of Egyptian women and 98% of foreign women surveyed stated they had suffered from sexual harassment[38]. Around 50% of them said they were harassed every day. “I would have paid more attention to it if I had had any sense of it[39],” Logan said.

Additionally, it is crucial for the discussion on this issue to continue. It is alarming that the majority of journalists who were sexually assaulted did not report the incident. This in particular applies to women who are afraid they will lose their beat or their assignment. Managers, editors and coworkers should make all efforts to keep the discussion alive and make sure all their staff is comfortable to talk about safety concerns.

In conclusion, it seems that the unfortunate and horrific event that Logan endured and her courage to come forward has taken some of the taboo away from sexual assault on journalists. Kim Barker writes about Lara Logan breaking the “code of silence[40]”:

There is an added benefit. Ms. Logan is a minor celebrity, one of the highest-profile women to acknowledge being sexually assaulted. Although she has reported from the front lines, the lesson she is now giving young women is probably her most profound: It’s not your fault. And there’s no shame in telling it like it is.

Bibliography:

Ann Friedman, “When rape is a risk that comes with the job” Feministing February 15, 2011. http://feministing.com/2011/02/15/when-rape-is-a-risk-that-comes-with-the-job/

Barker, Kim. "Why We Need Women in War Zones." New York Times 19 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/opinion/20barker.html>.

"CPJ security guide: Addendum on sexual aggression. "Committee to Protect Journalists . N.p., 07 June 2011. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://www.cpj.org/reports/2011/06/security-guide-addendum-sexual-aggression.php>.

Collins, Laura. " Reporting on war: Women in the line of fire." International News Safety Institute n.d., n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.newssafety.org/page.php?page=20263&cat=americas-media-safety>.

Drogin, Bob. "Egypt's women face growing sexual harassment." Los Angeles Times 23 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb/23/world/la-fg-egypt-women-abuse-20110223>.

Eltahawy, Mona. Personal Interview. 29 Nov 2011. <http://www.npr.org/2011/11/29/142895349/journalist-on-being-sexual-prey-in-egypt>

Hilsum, Lindsey. "Equality on the frontline is the only way." International News Safety Institute 19 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.newssafety.org/page.php?page=20263&cat=americas-media-safety>.

"http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/28/60minutes/main20058368.shtml." 60 Minutes 28 April 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/28/60minutes/main20058368.shtml>.

"Journalists sexually assaulted covering Egypt unrest." AFP 24 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article

Kleeman, Jenny. "Why discourage women from reporting on the Tahrir Squre protests?." Guardian 25 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk

Malik, Shiv. "Detention and release of Mona Eltahawy – in tweets." Guardian 24 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/24/mona-eltahawy-twitter-tweets-egypt>.

Matloff, Judith. "Female War Reporters Under Sexual Attack Overseas? All The Time." International

News Safety Institute 17 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.newssafety.org/page.php?page=19862&cat=middle-east-northern-africa-security>.

Matloff, Judith “Unspoken” Columbia Journalism Review February 8, 2011. http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/unspoken.php?page=all

Robinson, G. (2008). “Feminist Approaches to Journalism Studies.” Global Media Journal --Canadian Edition. Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 123-136

Ross, K (2001). “Women at Work: Journalism as an en-gendered practice” Journalism Studies 2:4, 531-4

Sherwood, Harriet. "Egypt protests: plea to keep women reporters out of Cairo withdrawn." Guardian 25 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/25/egypt-protests-reporters-women-safety>.

Smyth, Frank. "In journalist security field, maturing and understanding." CPJ Blog. Committee to Protect Journalists, 07 June 2011. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://cpj.org/blog/2011/06/in-journalist-security-field-maturing-and-understa.php>.

Stelter, Brian. "CBS Reporter Recounts a ‘Merciless’ Assault." New York Times 28 April 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. 

Shuter, Rob. "Network Execs May Pull Female Reporters From Egypt After Lara Logan Attack." PopEater 16 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.popeater.com/2011/02/16/egypt-female-reporter-attacks/>.

Wolfe, Lauren. The silencing crime: Sexual violence and journalists. Committee to Protect Journalists , 07, June, 2011. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://www.cpj.org/reports/2011/06/silencing-crime-sexual-violence-journalists.php>. 

"Women Reporting War: A Transcript of the Frontline Club Discussion." Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma . Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma , 05 Feb 2005. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://dartcenter.org/content/women-reporting-war-0>.

[1] "http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/28/60minutes/main20058368.shtml." 60 Minutes 28 April 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/28/60minutes/main20058368.shtml>.

[2] ibid

[3] ibid

[4] Wolfe, Lauren. The silencing crime: Sexual violence and journalists. Committee to Protect Journalists , 07, June, 2011. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://www.cpj.org/reports/2011/06/silencing-crime-sexual-violence-journalists.php>.

[5] ibid

[6] Malik, Shiv. "Detention and release of Mona Eltahawy – in tweets." Guardian 24 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/24/mona-eltahawy-twitter-tweets-egypt>.

[7] ibid

[8] Eltahawy, Mona. Personal Interview. 29 Nov 2011. <http://www.npr.org/2011/11/29/142895349/journalist-on-being-sexual-prey-in-egypt>

 

[9] "Journalists sexually assaulted covering Egypt unrest." AFP 24 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article>

[10] Shuter, Rob. "Network Execs May Pull Female Reporters From Egypt After Lara Logan Attack." PopEater 16 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.popeater.com/2011/02/16/egypt-female-reporter-attacks/>.

[11] ibid

[12] ibid

[13] Sherwood, Harriet. "Egypt protests: plea to keep women reporters out of Cairo withdrawn." Guardian 25 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/25/egypt-protests-reporters-women-safety>.

[14] ibid

[15] Sherwood, Harriet. "Egypt protests: plea to keep women reporters out of Cairo withdrawn." Guardian 25 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/25/egypt-protests-reporters-women-safety>.

[16] Kleeman, Jenny. "Why discourage women from reporting on the Tahrir Squre protests?." Guardian 25 Nov 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk

[17] ibid

[18] Barker, Kim. "Why We Need Women in War Zones." New York Times 19 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/opinion/20barker.html>.

[19] Barker, Kim. "Why We Need Women in War Zones." New York Times 19 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/opinion/20barker.html>.

[20] Collins, Laura. " Reporting on war: Women in the line of fire." International News Safety Institute n.d., n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.newssafety.org/page.php?page=20263&cat=americas-media-safety>.

[21] Hilsum, Lindsey. "Equality on the frontline is the only way." International News Safety Institute 19 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.newssafety.org/page.php?page=20263&cat=americas-media-safety>.

[22] Hilsum, Lindsey. "Equality on the frontline is the only way." International News Safety Institute 19 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.newssafety.org/page.php?page=20263&cat=americas-media-safety>.

[23] Ann Friedman, “When rape is a risk that comes with the job” Feministing February 15, 2011. http://feministing.com/2011/02/15/when-rape-is-a-risk-that-comes-with-the-job/

[24] Matloff, Judith. "Female War Reporters Under Sexual Attack Overseas? All The Time." International News Safety Institute 17 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.newssafety.org/page.php?page=19862&cat=middle-east-northern-africa-security>.

[25] Matloff, Judith “Unspoken” Columbia Journalism Review February 8, 2011. http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/unspoken.php?page=all

[26] "Women Reporting War: A Transcript of the Frontline Club Discussion." Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma . Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma , 05 Feb 2005. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://dartcenter.org/content/women-reporting-war-0>.

[27] "Women Reporting War A Transcript of the Frontline Club Discussion." Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma . Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma , 05 Feb 2005. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://dartcenter.org/content/women-reporting-war-0>.

[28] ibid

[29] "CPJ security guide: Addendum on sexual aggression. "Committee to Protect Journalists . N.p., 07 June 2011. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://www.cpj.org/reports/2011/06/security-guide-addendum-sexual-aggression.php>.

[30] ibid

[31] Wolfe, Lauren. The silencing crime: Sexual violence and journalists. Committee to Protect Journalists , 07, June, 2011. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://www.cpj.org/reports/2011/06/silencing-crime-sexual-violence-journalists.php>.

[32] Smyth, Frank. "In journalist security field, maturing and understanding." CPJ Blog. Committee to Protect Journalists, 07 June 2011. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://cpj.org/blog/2011/06/in-journalist-security-field-maturing-and-understa.php>.

[33] ibid

[34] Ross, K (2001). “Women at Work: Journalism as an en-gendered practice” Journalism Studies 2:4, 531-4

[35] Robinson, G. (2008). “Feminist Approaches to Journalism Studies.” Global Media Journal --Canadian Edition. Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 123-136

[36] Wolfe, Lauren. The silencing crime: Sexual violence and journalists. Committee to Protect Journalists , 07, June, 2011. Web. 7 Dec 2011. <http://www.cpj.org/reports/2011/06/silencing-crime-sexual-violence-journalists.php>.

[37] Stelter, Brian. "CBS Reporter Recounts a ‘Merciless’ Assault." New York Times 28 April 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. 

[38] Drogin, Bob. "Egypt's women face growing sexual harassment." Los Angeles Times 23 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb/23/world/la-fg-egypt-women-abuse-20110223>.

[39] Stelter, Brian. "CBS Reporter Recounts a ‘Merciless’ Assault." New York Times 28 April 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. 

[40] Barker, Kim. "Why We Need Women in War Zones." New York Times 19 Feb 2011, n. pag. Web. 7 Dec. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/opinion/20barker.html>.

 

Media Analysis of Egyptian Revolution

With the recent uprisings and revolutions in the Arab world, a big focus was given to the region’s issues in the world media. Perhaps one of the most reported of these revolutions was that of Egypt which lasted for 18 days and ended with the ouster of president Hosni Mubarak on February 11. Egypt has a special significance in the region and in the global community. A historic country, Egypt has a major influence in Middle Eastern politics and stability, and is a strong ally of the United States and the first Arab country to have a peace treaty with Israel.

In this essay, I will be looking at two different types of media outlets and their coverage of the events. Firstly, I will look at international media through Al Jazeera. I will then look at portrayal of events and protestors in Egyptian media.

Before proceeding, as part of the framework for critical assessment of media, I think it is important to analyze the possibility of my own bias. As a person of Egyptian origin, who has lived in Egypt for four years and as a person who worked in journalism and is currently pursuing my Master’s degree in the field, I followed the situation in Egypt extensively as a citizen, a consumer of news and through the mindset of a journalist.

I will start my analysis with an example of international media. Perhaps one of the outlets that had the most extensive coverage of the Egyptian revolution was the Qatari based Al Jazeera. The channel had reporters on the ground for both its Arabic and its English channels. Furthermore, Al Jazeera had a live feed throughout the revolution where live images from Tahrir Square, the center of the protests, was almost continuous. The channel also provided news coverage on its website.  

One of the best things about the channel’s coverage is that it went to the heart of the protests and provided videos, interviews and pictures rather than just words. This did create an emotional response though that could have swayed the viewers’ opinion. When looking at the framework for the critical assessment of media and its question of visuals, we can see that the images broadcasted were very dramatic, especially in the more violent days of the protests. They tended to create an emotional response from viewers. However, the images seemed to correspond with reality, as various news sources were broadcasting different angles of the same images and saying the same things- with the exception of Egyptian media.

The channel however, definitely focused more on the anti-government protests and their views. This seemed to be the trend in international media and the opposite seemed to be true for Egyptian media who focused on pro-government demonstrations. Using one of the questions of the framework, as far as I can tell, the statements and reports pass truth tests and do correspond with reality. The pro-democracy protestors far outnumbered the pro-government protestors. It seemed acceptable then, that coverage would be more swayed towards the majority side, as long as mention was made of the other side.

In a video report entitled Egypt Burning- Standoff on the Nile [1], Al Jazeera chronicles the days of most violence between pro and anti- government protestors. In it, the images are dramatic and the focus is on the pro-democracy protestors. There is however a few minutes of mention of the pro-Mubarak protestors in the approximately 25 minute program. The program uses strong language such as “...Egypt descends into chaos,” and the reporters use strong words to describe the scene unfolding in front of them. The chaos was blamed on the pro-Mubarak demonstrators and the program goes on to say that there is increasing evidence they are actually undercover state police or people “paid to come and agitate the protestors.” Reporters rely on eyewitness sources that say some of the pro-government demonstrators have been captured and their identity cards show that they were police. Al Jazeera however, did not give a chance for these pro-Mubarak protestors to defend themselves on the program.

Although, it seems that it was reporting on the truth, Al Jazeera clearly did show a bias towards one side of the story. With the emphasis being on pro-democracy protestors, the channel did capture the majority view and feeling of the revolution. Yet it should have given more space for people opposing the protests. Uneven coverage puts Al Jazeera in a position where its integrity could be compromised. This is especially true if we consider the reports in the Guardian in December 2010 that claim that a Wikileaks document claims that Qatari Prime Minister, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani told the US Senator, John Kerry, that he had proposed a bargain with the Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak, which involved stopping broadcasts in Egypt in exchange for a change in Cairo's position on Israel-Palestinian negotiations.[2]” A more unbiased perspective on the revolution would have helped it steer clear from the image that it is trying to tarnish the ex-Egyptian regime.

On the other extreme, the Egyptian media focused heavily on pro-government supporters. It is important to know that the ex-Egyptian regime had media under tight control and that there was heavy censorship. In Module 5 of our course we can see that Hachten and Scotton put Egypt under the Authoritarian concept with government controlled media in their five basic theories of the press. [3]

Egyptian state TV frequently had callers who claimed to be protestors talk about foreign agents and influences that have taken over the protests and made it their own. The pro-democracy protestors were sometimes branded as traitors and people who were paid to do it. Ahram Online reports (post-revolution) that a TV presenter made this claim on national TV: “It has become clear now that protestors are being given $100 and a Kentucky Fried Chicken [KFC] meal every day by certain ‘foreign entities’ serving wicked agendas [4].”

Videos on YouTube show clips from the Egyptian media where near hysterical callers claim to be people who protested in the beginning of the revolution and now regret what happened because it was hijacked by foreigners. The most jarring of these was a call on the Egyptian TV station Al Mehwar where an un-named woman claims to have been a part of a group that was sent to countries in Europe and the US to be trained by the CIA and Israeli Mossad to start a revolution in Egypt and cause instability in the country[5]. The “suspicious Zionist force” behind this was an organization called Freedom House, she claimed. She was originally protesting pro-democracy but saw the forces of the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas taking over the square, she said. The Egyptian anchors appear to be shocked, and ask her to re-state some of the more dramatic parts of her speech. They thank her for her bravery and claim the importance of these allegations. They ask her why she didn’t approach the international media, and she says she tried repeatedly but they don’t record her conversations, she then says they did but they didn’t publish it. They specifically name Al Jazeera among channels they frame as misconstruing information.

The caller continues to claim that there are more than 3 million people (unconfirmed information) protesting with her, pro-Mubarak. She hysterically and emotionally yells “we are sorry ‘Papa’ Mubarak...we are not ungrateful.” No background is said about who this person is or why the source should be trusted. The caller claims to have evidence of her allegations, but the anchors don’t press her to find out what kind of evidence she has. She claims she would proudly say her name but is too scared of her colleagues and these foreign forces that will come and seek revenge from her for exposing the truth. 

The Egyptian media is usually not trusted in the first place. They blatantly used emotional sources to try and give a certain image of the protestors. They made claims that seem absurd, such as that protesters were offered KFC for food, when the KFC in the square was shut after the first day of protests. Their sources could not be verified, their claims had no evidence, they relied on emotional reactions and their images were in discrepancy with true events, such as is demonstrated in this Al Jazeera clip that shows a split screen of Al Jazeera coverage and state TV coverage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SszZDDkGp-I. They have failed to be objective if we look at their coverage through the media critical assessment framework.

Analyzing both outlets we can see that both of these outlets at times showed such discrepancy that it bordered on absurd. Because of Egyptian media’s propaganda reputation, it was easier and more trustworthy to rely on international media. A proof of the national media’s propaganda is how quickly the media’s message changed when Mubarak fell to celebrating and glorifying the protestors. [6] It is important to keep in mind who controls the media and who influences it. Al Jazeera is not free of bias either, especially with the allegations of Wikileaks making it seem more suspicious and influenced by Qatari foreign policy. However, it definitely did the better job at trying to report the truth.

 

[1] AlJazeeraEnglish. (Producer). (2011). Egypt burning-standoff on the nile. [Web]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dxn0Afd1hu8&feature=channel_video_title
[2] Booth, R. (2010, December 6). Wikileaks cables claim al-jazeera changed coverage to suit qatari foreign policy. The Guardian , Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-al-jazeera-qatari-foreign-policy
[3] Hachten, W. & Scotton, J. (2007). The world news prism: Global information in a satellite age. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
[4] El-Wardani , S. (2011, February 21). Egypt calls for a media revolution. Ahram Online , Retrieved from http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/1/64/5921/Egypt/Politics-/Egypt-calls-for-a-media-revolution.aspx
[5] Mehwar. (Producer). (2011). Egyptian tv propaganda: we are sorry "papa" mubarak [english subtitles]. [Web]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiCJaVxvpc8&feature=related
[6] Zayed, D, & Hammond, A. (2011, February 15). Egypt state media change tune after mubarak's fall. Reuters , Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/15/us-egypt-media-freedom-idUSTRE71E5J520110215

Psychological analysis of the day of compassion

For the assigned Day of Compassion I decided to try and be compassionate towards people in ways more than just financial. Usually I would express compassion on a daily basis by helping people who asked for money. But for this day, I decided to not only do that but try and be as aware of people’s needs, problems and suffering as I can be and try to help them in any way I can.  I aimed to encourage my compassion to encompass everyone I crossed paths with that day

The incidents I went through in the Day of Compassion helped me realize a lot of things. What I found strange was that I felt as if the Day of Compassion had given me a pass to do all the things I always wanted to do but was too afraid to. Like offering help to people who weren’t asking for it and smiling at strangers disregarding the fact that the smiles might be mistakenly perceived as something else. I was afraid of performing acts like these because I never knew how people would react to my actions. I was always afraid I would be seen as an intruder and as a person who was arrogant and thought everyone needed help. After this day I realized that these thoughts were pathetic justifications and that even if they were true, helping anyone who really does want help and doesn’t know how to ask is worth taking that risk. The benefits of being compassionate definitely outweigh the costs.

I also realized that financial help is not the only help a person can offer, sometimes the concern for another person and just being a helping hand and a listening ear to someone in need will greatly improve their psychological state and ease their suffering. The simple act of knowing I made someone smile made me feel like I connected with someone, even a stranger, and might have helped improve their mood, even if only for a second. I found this extremely refreshing and uniquely gratifying.

That day I spent a few hours with my Grandmother who has Alzheimer’s disease. I sat with her and gave her my full attention and just rejoiced in giving her the company she greatly needed. I was not even once annoyed at the fact that she kept repeating the same questions or that we had the same conversation for hours. I actually felt grateful that I was able to be someone she enjoyed sitting with. At first I thought it was the Day of Compassion, but then I realized that this is the way I usually treat my Grandmother. This helped me realize that human beings sometimes have the capacity to do compassionate things by nature and that these actions seem so subtle and natural that they do not even notice doing them.

I came to the conclusion that the person I was before The Day of Compassion was the same person I was on that day with the exception that I was previously holding myself back in fear. That day helped me lose those bonds and become the person I always wanted to be. I believe that this day assisted me in finally helping me overcome these unreal ‘social’ boundaries I had put up to protect myself and others (or so I thought).

An example of this new sense of liberation was the night after the Day of Compassion. I was in a taxi cab, and the driver kept on whispering to himself and saying “I really want to sleep, just an hour; oh God please let me sleep for just an hour.” For the first second when I overheard this I thought to myself “ Oh God I hope I get home safe” but then a thought popped into my mind saying “ I really hope this man gets home safe too and has some rest and overcomes any problems he might have”. Then I told myself that my wishes for him shouldn’t be my only step. When we reached my apartment building I had a bottle of cold water that I had with me. I gave him the bottle and told him “Here take some cold water to keep you stay fresh and awake…be safe.” The Day of Compassion helped me realize that actions are needed not just thoughts. I also learned to do the thing that seems compassionately right and ignore any justifications for not doing them. Before I gave him the bottle I thought “What if he gets offended?” but then I realized I am thinking about how his offense will retaliate onto me and how it would affect me. When I realized how self-centered I was being I understood that my first impulse which was giving him the bottle was the right thing to do. The man accepted it and thanked me graciously. I was extremely glad to notice that the mind set I had put myself in for the Day of Compassion is still with me today and I know it will stay with me form now on.

I believe that human nature harbors compassion towards others, in some people this compassion just has to be recognized. I also believe that society would benefit tremendously if we all act compassionately towards each other. A society where people treat each other compassionately will be a land of happiness. Some might think that this idea is far fetched but if we take into consideration the injunctive norm of reciprocity, where people tend to respond to others the way those others acted towards them we see that this is possible. If you are treated compassionately you will most likely treat compassionately, which will help foster a stronger community.